#IndiaStrikesBack – Finally!
Something that was long overdue.
For my uninitiated readers across
the globe, for the first time since India’s Independence in 1947, Indian Army
has crossed the unresolved Line of Control [LoC] in Kashmir and entered
Pakistan occupied Kashmir [Pok], neutralising 7 terrorist launch pads across 4
locations. It is a proud moment for any Indian that loves peace. Finally, an
answer back to the instigators that adventures like Uri and Pathankot attacks
on Indian army instalments, killing scores of Indian soldiers without
provocation would not go unpunished. Today, being a proud Indian, I can state
that India does and can attack at its own will and choosing of a time and place
against any adversary that works against the interests and integrity of India.
It looks good on text-books when one reads that India has never been an aggressor
in the last 5000 years of its existence. Now when the existence and more
importantly the ideologies are threatened that makes up the very nation, it is
high time, the polices are reviewed, revised and updated.
Every surgery aims to cure the
patient. In this case, the surgery precisely took out a tumour [terrorist launch-pads]
and rendered the patient [Pakistan] in a coma as a fallout, albeit temporarily
– a first of many firsts to come. It is the coming of age of India as a
stronger nation in the current geo-political set-up where foreign policies are
concerned. But the cancer has spread far and wide. It needs regular chemotherapy
at different parts of the body – starting with Baluchistan, NWFP,
Gilgit-Baltistan under PoK, etc.
There are many areas that I would
like to touch upon but is not possible to compile into a single blog post. This
is the first of the series that touches upon how Pakistan as a state has failed
and has remained unchanged over the last 70 years despite its ideologies and failing as a state every time when its time to rise and shine came and went away; the similarities between the situation of 1971 and 2016 are starkly similar!...
For any Army in a Democratic set-up, Political backing is must [Pakistan doesn’t fall into this category; it is the other way around in case of Pakistan]. An army is what it’s political masters wants it to be. It can be a destructive lethal weapon, like German SS in World War II leading to Blitzkrieg or it can be completely apolitical like Indian Army which hardly meddles in the political affairs of the country. Indian Army had almost lost its edge and was toothless in its effectiveness after Independence due to Nehruvian policies of pacifism and NAM; believing China to be too docile to attack India. Jolt – rather a rude shock came in the form of humiliating defeat of 1962 Chinese aggression that left India red-faced and was caught pants down; showing that if you value peace, one cannot compromise with its defence. It’s easy to preach about love and compassion when the borders are secure. Henderson-Brooks report was instrumental in highlighting the deficiencies that were rectified to an extent by 1965 and finally fully implemented before 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War under the stewardship of Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Indian Army, has been always held under a tight leash with poor political will throughout its 70yrs of existence, except during brief periods of Prime-Ministership of Mrs. Gandhi. Hopefully, Mr. Modi’s Prime Ministership would bring back that old glory that every major power yearns to achieve.
There are many parallels that can
be drawn in this regard, between 1971 situation and 2016.
Firstly, Pakistan was in a similar situation of instigating conflict in both the occasions. Massacre of Bengali intellectuals and mass genocide and meddling in the affairs at provincial level then, overriding the federal government in East Pakistan was the chief cause of 1971 conflict; that eventually led to the creation of Bangladesh. In current scenario, it’s the low intensity conflicts and now continuous disturbance in Kashmir since the killing of Hizbul Commander Burhan Wani, which are alarmingly occurring at regular intervals within India.
Firstly, Pakistan was in a similar situation of instigating conflict in both the occasions. Massacre of Bengali intellectuals and mass genocide and meddling in the affairs at provincial level then, overriding the federal government in East Pakistan was the chief cause of 1971 conflict; that eventually led to the creation of Bangladesh. In current scenario, it’s the low intensity conflicts and now continuous disturbance in Kashmir since the killing of Hizbul Commander Burhan Wani, which are alarmingly occurring at regular intervals within India.
Secondly, India was and is almost
perceived a weakling globally; India had lost the 1962 war; From 1966-1969,
India was in a constant state of famine and also had to fight a costly war in
1965. We had to import wheat from US which were not fit for human consumption
under PL-480 where Mrs. Gandhi had to face humiliation from Kissinger and
Nixon; which ultimately gave rise to the Green Revolution. Presently, India has
gone through a political logjam of UPA2 that throttled Indian growth to a
huge extent being a coalition government with an extremely poor track-record
with scams to gloat about. After 2001 Parliament Attack, followed by 26/11,
Indian response has been largely muted. Every possible trick in the book in
accordance with diplomacy and Track-II dialogues have been explored to cajole
Pakistan, but without any success.
Thirdly, in a bi-polar and
pluralistic world, there were NATO and Warsaw Pacts during 1970’s that
influenced the world engagements. US clearly sided with Pakistan while India
had the backing of USSR in the 1971 conflict. Today, while US is in a difficult
position to side with Pakistan out of little choice, Pakistan’s real ally is
the new super-power in rising – PR China. India still has the backing of USSR
and USA – a reversal of policies [which I will cover in Part 2 on this topic];
but the point that I want to drive home is that there are clearly 2 groups that
has to gain out of this engagement; One is China which is a now behemoth in its
own rights with enough economic clout and the other is US that has a natural
ally in India as it stretches itself thin across the world and cannot do
without India given the decline in the world authority that is has seen over the past decade.
America’s glory days are well over and is in slow decline.
Fourthly, the brazenness with
which India had intervened in 1971 and now proactively conducted the surgical
strikes inside Pakistani territory when the world, and especially Pakistan
least expected it. Pakistani army was actually caught napping; Pakistani army
and terrorist casualties in the recent surgical strikes by India were being
passed as cross-border firing by Pak DG-ISPR; too humiliated to accept the fact that a surgical strike
indeed has been conducted by India, that stains the reputation of Pakistani
Army, which is sacrosanct.
Fifthly and rightly so – a strong
personality based Indian leadership. Mrs. Gandhi left a lasting impression on
the history of Independent India during her tumultuous rule. So does Mr. Modi
who had to face enough political challenges to rise and become the PM. Both
became the PM due to their charismatic personality and being able to move the
masses. Both have uncanny similarities in the way they function.
Lastly, the raison d’etre of
Pakistan’s existence [a topic in itself]. Pakistan [which is an acronym] was
created based on Jinnah’s “Two Nation Theory” propagated by Iqbal but actually
initiated by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. During 1971, it was a nation still in
experimentation, going though alternate coups and civilian government leadership
and subjugating the more learned and intellectual East Pakistanis under the
rules, culture and traditions of West Pakistan. Urdu was declared the national
language without taking into account the rich Bengali literature and traditions
that has given a Noble Laureate and ultimately the National Anthem of both Bangladesh
and India; basically a culture clash between two groups in the same country
separated by a thousand miles that were broadly dissimilar in every possible
way but united by a common faith. After the humiliating loss of half the
territory in 1971 which India had to intervene giving rise to the independent
nation of Bangladesh, Pakistan then focussed single-handedly on bleeding India
through thousand cuts that started at the fag-end of eighties and have continued
to this date, unabated – reaching its pinnacle during the Kargil misadventure.
In reality, Pakistan as a state, in my opinion, failed in 1971 – unable to
uphold the tenets of ‘Two Nation Theory” advocated by the founding father, Mr.
Jinnah.
Today, Pakistani intelligentsia
and military elite have been subjugated under a systemic pressure and culture
to identify India as a common enemy, to the extent that history has been
completely re-written in school text-books that identifies India as the aggressor
in the all the wars that has been fought with India and none of the wars where
Pakistan has conceded any defeat. Pakistan officially denies any defeat at the
hands of India and has been able to brain-wash generations through its
education system. There are enough proofs of the same – the most vocal being
Ms. Christine Fair who has done extensive studies on Indo-Pak relationship,
having written numerous books and spent a number of years in Pakistan; at
the moment she is banned to travel to Pakistan at behest of Pakistan’s infamous
ISI. She has even lambasted a Pakistani Fulbright scholar on his ignorance that
Kashmir is not an integral part of Pakistan based on UN resolution when he
foolishly tries to portray that Mr. Fair’s evidence of Pakistani legitimacy on
Kashmir is questionable. The video below is the proof in itself!
It is not in India’s interest
that Pakistan fails as a nation. But when the national ideology, the basis on
which a nation was formed has failed, it is pertinent to ask the question – is
it relevant to prop up a nation on ventilator? Or let the patient die? For long
Pakistan has solely survived on the aids provided by USA that has gone into
arms procurement to deter India. Today, if one delves in finding out what
Pakistan exports, it will not be wrong to say that, “Terrorism as a service” [TaaS]
is the only thing that comes to mind.
It needs to be pondered!
To be Continued...
Game of Anarchy, touches upon few of the points of backdoor diplomacy in such tricky situations...
To be Continued...
Game of Anarchy, touches upon few of the points of backdoor diplomacy in such tricky situations...